DISKRESI POLISI DALAM PENANGANAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN

Studi Kasus di Wilayah Hukum Polsek Pidie

Authors

  • Bonita Izwany STIS AL HILAL SIGLI, ACEH
  • Ema Diana STIS AL HILAL SIGLI, ACEH

Keywords:

Justice, Discretion, Sector Police

Abstract

This study aims to find out about police discretion in handling theft crimes (case study in the jurisdiction of the Pidie Police). The research method used in compiling this thesis is a qualitative method to obtain data in the field, the author uses the Library research method (library research) and field research (field research), namely by using observation, interview, and documentation techniques. The results of the study indicate that the Police's efforts in the form of preventing theft crimes by providing protection to the public so as not to become victims of other thefts and the Mechanism taken by the police in resolving the problem of theft against reports received by the police is the first by visiting the Crime Scene (TKP), examining the victim and witnesses or the Examination Report (BAP). 2. The obstacles faced by the police chief in resolving the existing problems are inadequate facilities and infrastructure, disconnected information networks, lack of evidence and witnesses, apathetic society, inadequate supporting facilities at the crime scene. The role of the police in handling cases of minor theft is based on the memorandum of understanding between the court, the prosecutor's office and the police which normatively states that if the stolen amount is less than two million five hundred thousand rupiah, it will be resolved in the village or from the police chief's program, namely restorative justice, if more than two million five hundred thousand rupiah is taken, it must be resolved in court, and if someone reports this minor theft crime, we will still process it by calling the suspects and victims or giving customary sanctions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

C.S.T Simorangkir, dkk, Kamus Hukum Iindonesia, Jakarta: Alinea Baru, 1980

Danggur Feliks, dkk, Konsep Standar Profesi Advokad dalam mewujudkan Advokat Profesional, Makassar: PT. Nas Media Indonesia, 2018.

Donald A, Rumokoy dan Frans Maramis, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, cet 3, Jakarta, Rajawali Pers, 2016.

Endang Widi Winami, Teori dan Praktik Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, PTK, R & D, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika Offset, 2018.

Faal, M, Penyaringan Perkara Pidana Oleh Kepolisian (Diskresi Kepolisian), Jakarta: PT. Pradya Paramita, 2001.

Fachmi, Kepastian Hukum Mengenai Putusan Batal Demi Hukum dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia, Jakarta, PT Graha Indonesia Publishing, 2011.

H, Pudi Rahardi, Hukum Kepolisian (Profesionalisme dan Reformasi Polri), Surabaya: Laksbang Mediatama, 2007.

Harun, Hukum Administrasi Negara di Era Citizen Frendly, Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press, 2018.

Imron Rosyadi, dkk, Victim Precipitation Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencurian (Sebuah Pendekatan Victimologi), Jakarta: Duta Media Publishing, 2020.

Kadar M Yusuf, Tafsir Ayat Ahkam:Tafsir Tematik Ayat-Ayat Hukum, Jakarta: Amzah, 2011.

M. Faal, Penyaringan Perkara Pidana Oleh Polisi (Diskresi Kepolisian), Jakarta, Pradanya Pramita, 1991.

Maya Septiani, Diskresi dalam Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Publik, (Jakarta Selatan: Ombudsman Republik Indonesia) diakses pada situs https://ombudsman.go.id/artikel/r/artikel--diskresi-dalam-penyelenggaraan-pelayanan-publik tanggal 17 Juli 2023

Mhd Taufiqurrahman, Hukum Administrasi Negara di Indonesia, Malang: CV. Lestari Nusantara Abadi, 2022.

Prajudi Admosudirdjo, Hukum Administrasi Negara, Jakarta, Ghalia Indonesia, 1995

Puspa Yan Pramadya, Kamus Hukum: Bahasa Belanda, Indonesia, Inggris, Semarang, Aneka, 1991.

Rafika Nur Dkk, Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Gorontalo: CV. Cahaya Arsh Publisher & Printing, 2022.

Rahmanuddin Tomali, Hukum Pidana, Yogyakarta, Deepublish, 2019

Ruslan Renggong, Hukum Acara Pidana (Memahami Perlindungan Ham dan Proses Penahanan Di Indonesia), Jakarta, Kencana, 2014.

S.R. Sianturi, Tindak Pidana Di Kuhp, Berikut Uraiannya Alumni AHM-PTHM, Jakarta, 1983.

Sadjijono, Hukum Kepolisian,Yogyakarta: Laksabang Presindo, 2006

Sadjijono, Memahami Hukum Kepolisian, Yogyakarta: PT. Laksbang Prasindo, 2010.

Sajipto Rahardjo, Polisi Sipil dalam Perubahan Sosial di Indonesia, Jakarta, Kompas, 2009.

Sajipto Raharjo, Ilmu Hukum, Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya, 1991.

Subroto Brotodiredjo, polri sebagai penegak hukum, Jakarta, Penerbit Fakultas Hukum, 1995.

Sulistyowati, Alternatif Penegakan Hukum Pidana Berbasis Nilai Keadilan, Yogyakarta, Deepublish, 2020.

Tongat, Hukum Pidana Materiil, cet-3, Malang: Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, 2006.

Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan dan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHP. Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali, Jakarta, PT. Sinar Grafika, 2001.

Yulikhsan, Eri, Keputusan Diskresi dalam Dinamika Pemerintahan (aplikasi dalam PTUN), Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2016.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-31

How to Cite

Izwany, B. ., & Diana, E. (2023). DISKRESI POLISI DALAM PENANGANAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN: Studi Kasus di Wilayah Hukum Polsek Pidie. Jurnal Tahqiqa : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam, 17(2), 114–133. Retrieved from https://jurnal.stisalhilalsigli.ac.id/index.php/tahqiqa/article/view/289

Issue

Section

Articles