PENANGANAN TINDAK PIDANA KORPORASI DAN PROSPEK PENGEMBANGANNYA DI INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61393/heiema.v5i2.517Keywords:
corporate crime, criminal liability, law enforcementAbstract
The increasingly complex evolution of the business world has given rise to various forms of corporate crime that have far-reaching impacts on the national economy, the environment, and public rights. Corporations are no longer viewed solely as subjects of civil law but also as subjects of criminal law that can be held accountable. This article aims to analyze the handling of corporate crimes in Indonesia, the forms of corporate criminal liability, the obstacles to law enforcement, and the prospects for the future development of regulations and enforcement regarding corporate criminal law. The study employs a normative legal research method, utilizing both statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that although Indonesia possesses an adequate legal foundation—such as Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2016—corporate criminal law enforcement still faces various challenges regarding legal substance, the enforcement structure, and legal culture. Therefore, strengthening regulations and enhancing the capacity of law enforcement officials are essential to ensure the effective and equitable handling of corporate crimes.
References
Fabian Teichmann, Chiara Wittmann, Sonia Boticiu. (2023). Compliance as a form of defense against corporate criminal liability. Journal of Economic Criminology. Volume 1, September 2023, 100004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2023.100004
Gunawan, A., & Kristian, H. (2018). Penegakan Hukum Pidana terhadap Korporasi di Indonesia: Tantangan dan Prospek. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 48(3), 321–345.
Marzuki, P. M. (2022). The Essence of Legal Research is to Resolve Legal Problems. Yuridika, 37(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v37i1.34597
Muladi & Dwidja Priyatno. (2015). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi. Jakarta: Kencana.
Muladi, & Priyatno, D. (2019). Hukum Pidana Korporasi: Teori dan Implementasi. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
OECD. (1997). Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 tentang Tata Cara Penanganan Perkara Tindak Pidana oleh Korporasi.
Prasetyo, T. (2019). Efektivitas Sanksi Pidana terhadap Korporasi dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Ekonomi. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kertha Semaya, 7(8), 1–12.
Sari, D. P. (2020). Integrasi Penegakan Hukum Pidana, Administratif, dan Perdata dalam Penanganan Kejahatan Korporasi. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia, 7(2), 145–162.
Sjahdeini, S. R. (2017). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi dalam Hukum Positif Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2015). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 jo. Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang.
United Nations. (2003). United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC). New York: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC).
Yeni Widowaty. (2017). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Terhadap Korban Dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup. Jurnal Yudisial, 5(2), 154-169. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v5i2.152
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Putri Meywa Ardina Nandikasari, Melinda Aprilia Zakia Usman, Abdul Aziz, Audy Fitriani, Salwaa Aziizah Avrilita Laksmi, Moh Taufik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
